November 19, 2007
Karl Dorrell Apologizes … To DumpDorrell Reader
An inspired DumpDorrell reader emailed Karl Dorrell regarding Dorrell's incendiary comments over the weekend suggesting that UCLA and Bruin Nation were racist for not having given him "a fair shake." The DD reader's email was direct and unapologetic (printed below). Surprisingly, Karl Dorrell responded. We will let you draw your own conclusions, but it is noteworthy that Karl is already distancing himself from the article and the position posed by the article.
It is also clear to us that when we read Dorrell's response to the race question in the tabloid hit piece by Kurt Streeter in the LAT Dorrell KNEW he was responding to the RACE question. As a 5-year coach and representative of UCLA he should know better than to say he was not given a fair shake or a level playing field WITHOUT removing suspicion of UCLA from his remark. At the very least it was highly negligent, at worst it an indictment on UCLA - and Dan Guerrero, Terry Donahue, and Bruin Nation - as being racists.
There is obviously a huge problem with black coaches not getting chances to fill NCAA football coaching positions, as well as racism all over America. There is no question Karl Dorrell has run into racism throughout his professional life. But UCLA is not the problem. One email to one fan, or even many emails to many fans, WILL NOT DUE! We reiterate our position that is shared by Dorrell's detractors and supporters alike: Karl Dorrell needs to make a public statement that UCLA has indeed given him a fair shake and a level playing field and remove all suspicion that UCLA and Bruin Nation are racist.
Here is the email (with obvious privacy adjustments; bold emphasis as is):
From: Karl Dorrell [mailto:KDorrellATathletics ucla edu]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 4:46 PM
To: ———
Subject: Re: Racism at UCLA
Mr. ——–,
I received you email and I wanted to clarify what I said. I was asked the question about racism in the coaching profession and I told the reporter that we still have issues in this profession with qualified minority candidates getting head coaching opportunities. That was expressed in a general sense, not as an indictment about UCLA. I have seen a lot of issues in this profession over the last 20 years, none whatsoever has occured in my tenure at UCLA dealing with me. We have 6 out of 119 division 1 head coaches that are African American in college football. This was the subject we were talking discussing at the time of the interview.
I apologize for the embarrassment.
Sincerely,
Karl Dorrell
11/19/2007 12:43 PM
Please respond to ————-
To kdorrellATathletics ucla edu
Subject Racism at UCLA
Coach Dorrell:
Your quotes to the LA Times yesterday are an embarrassment to yourself and the entire UCLA community.
How could you possibly suggest that you have not received a fair shake?
You have been given every opportunity to succeed at UCLA. This was supposed to be THE year.
It’s easy to blame injuries, but that doesn’t explain the loss to Utah. It doesn’t explain why we did not have a capable backup QB during the Notre Dame game. It doesn’t explain some of the utterly bizarre in-game decisions you’ve made or allowed to be made during the past five years. It doesn’t explain our team’s inability to win mid-to-low level bowl games. I could go on and on.
At almost every turn, you’ve tried and you have failed to succeed. And, now, you want us to believe that fans, alums and boosters who want a new head coach are racists? That’s bull.
If you were leading our football team to championships and people wanted you fired, then maybe you could claim racism.
Frankly, I wish our team was winning championships. If it were, I would be behind you 100% because, you see, it’s about wins, losses and championships, not race.
You’re an embarrassment to UCLA and its proud tradition of diversity which includes national treasures such as Jackie Robinson and Arthur Ashe. The administration should fire you today because of the embarrassment you’ve brought to the university.
Understand this: Your comments have done only one thing – they have succeeded at alienating your few remaining supporters.
If you’re an honorable individual (as I thought you were before the article was published despite my disappointment in your win-loss record), you will spare the university the need to fire you by apologizing for your comments and resigning immediately.
Sincerely,
————
Thousand Oaks, CA



















7 Comments on Karl Dorrell Apologizes … To DumpDorrell Reader
November 19, 2007
Diego @ 11:48 pm:
OUTSTANDING Email. This email, coupled with the emailed I exchanged with Kurt Streeter, shows the GRAVE mistake that Sunday’s article committed. AFter I read the post on this site regarding Streeter’s Article, I wasn’t angered as much as I was pleased, because to me it indicated that KD is trying to swing his way out any way that he can. that must mean that the administration is all around him to leave.
This move also, as I wrote, advances our position, because it shows KD attacking the school that has made him a millionaire and has given him the chance to LEARN how to be a head coach. After all, he IS STILL LEARNING, and this can’t be denied by any writer, adminstration member or KD himself.
This article is a great step forward for our cause. Unfortunately, it’s a great step back for relations.
November 20, 2007
Pat Maginnis @ 8:26 am:
Time to start recruiting a real football coach not a caretaker. We should have had Osaar ready from game # 1. He is a great quarterback. He could have helped in the WSU, ASU, Notre Dame, Utah, and Arizona games if KD had been a real coach who had perspective. I suggest we start talking to Mangione at KU, Norm Chow at Tennessee who has coached four Heisman winners, and is the greatest offensive mind in the US, along with Bob Stoops at OU, and Mike Leach at Texas Tech. UCLA needs two things to become a football and not just a basketball powerhouse— a good head coach (I still love Bob Toledo; he was one game away in 1998 at Miami when he was robbed on an imaginery fumble by a nitwit Big East official who ran the width of the field to overrule the offical on the spot) and a campus stadium. We should seek both now.
Don Buck @ 10:54 am:
I believe Karl Dorrell and his response to the Streeter article in the LAT. Dorrell has shown his remarkable honestly throughout his tenure at UCLA. The man is an upfront type of guy. There is no “race card” issue being pushed by Dorrell.
Let’s judge the coach on wins and losses and not this other crap being distributed by those who want other reasons to dispose of Dorrell.
Michael @ 1:34 pm:
I believe Karl Dorrell in his email. Yes, he should have been smart enough to clear UCLA explicitly (or made sure the reporter did). But it’s obvious that he isn’t very good at constructing clear verbal sentences, so I’ll give him the benefit of doubt.
Louis Miranda @ 2:10 pm:
Way to go Diego! Great response to Streeter the idiot. I think maybe he is the racist in all of this. I’ll bet my house if Dorrell was white he would agree with us and want white dorrell fired.
tom levin @ 7:13 pm:
It is a sad state of affairs of all schools to say didn’t give him a “Fair shake” is UCLA. If he were a white coach he would have been fired two years ago on general poor overall performance. He has been given TOO much of a chance because UCLA did not want to look like there was a race issue. He, Dorrell, is not looking at his inalbilty to coach and is going on the defensive by saying it’s a race issue. HE IS, as Larry Elder would say, “A victocrat!!” Grow up Dorrell and be a man and don’t hide behind, I am a poor black man, whaaaaaaa, and nobody likes me. You are pathetic!!!
Tom Levin
Tustin Bruin @ 8:06 pm:
Well said Tom!! Duhrell is playing the ” Poo Black OJ card”