TJ Simers pretty much devoted his column yesterday to you all, "the Dump Dorrell crowd."  Oddly, he was kind … well sort of.  First, Simers sets up the final moments of the Cal game and how it all was on the line for Dorrell and UCLA football on one single play:

Just a minute to go in Saturday's game, and it appears (DC DeWayne) Walker's career is developing quite nicely if he wants to be a head coach. And soon.

Cal is in position to essentially end the Bruins' season, the Dump Dorrell crowd swelling, the pressure about to mount on Guerrero. One minute to go and Guerrero is standing on the goal line, arms folded, judge and jury, watching Dorrell's team. The Rose Bowl is alive with noise and excitement, as good as it gets — as horrible as it might be if all goes askew in the next few seconds.

As we said, one play - one single play - ended up being the fine line between Dorrell getting hammered for another loss and Dorrellistas talking national championship again. Crazy, manic stuff.  If Guerrero is looking for one play to help him determine if Dorrell should stay, then he already should know his answer!  Simers, of course the journalist, loves this stuff: 

IT'S WHAT makes UCLA football so compelling these days, this up-and-down ride with Dorrell — and with so many convinced he's the wrong guy for the job.

A win here changing nothing. A loss here almost always expected. Will it ever be any different with Dorrell in command? Will the day ever come when the UCLA faithful embrace him?

Not sure if that day will ever come TJ.   Dorrell was an experiment, an on-the-job training experiment that has had its time.  5 years is long enough to convince many Bruins that we have the wrong coach.  But there are the lovers of mediocrity that kill any attempt to make our most visible, profitable, revenue-generating sport an example of excellence.  This chasm, this "up-and-down ride," is not "compelling" … it is killing the spirit of UCLA football.  Both sides of this ridiculous and unnecessary debate point fingers at the other side as being the source of the problem.  It's infuriating, maddening and totally wasteful … as Simers himself points out:  

IT'S SO depressing. So satisfying. They lose to the absolute worst teams out there, they beat the No. 10-ranked team in the land. They play terrible. They play great.

UCLA infuriating football, of course, as orchestrated by Karl Dorrell.  It's a win over California, the worst thing possible for those "dumpdorrell.com" proponents — at least for another week — but the best finish imaginable for UCLA fans. Sometimes the very same people on both accounts.

Yes, we "the Dump Dorrell crowd" are huge fans of UCLA football.  We are the fans that want excellence for our program, for our players.  Beating Cal was a great thing, but we see it for what it was … a win handed to Dorrell by mistake-prone Tedford.  We just don't expect Dorrell to keep winning … as TJ himself points out, inconsistency is Dorrell's calling card.  Dorrell will most likely have our team lose badly again, and hopefully Dan Guerrero will finally put an end to the source of this destructive Bruin division. 

TJ, of all people, should know that this is not a new problem for UCLA, which makes it even more infuriating.  We've had this problem before with Farmer, Hazzard, Lavin … WE SHOULD KNOW BETTER!!!  Once Dorrell is finally gone we will all look back at this period and remember how bad it was just like we do Lavin, and some of us Farmer and Hazzard.  Because hopefully Dan Guerrero and UCLA will finally have learned the lesson we've been taught so many times … Make a commitment to excellence … the rewards are unparalleled!!! TJ, the solution has not changed … Dump Dorrell!

Bookmark to: